CaribbeanFever / FeverEyes / CaribFever

Caribbean Fever - Your ONLY destination to all things Caribbean and more

Can You Guess Which of These Photos Got Banned by Instagram?

This week, model Chrissy Teigen joined the growing movement to #FreeTheNipple, posting a photo from a W magazine photoshoot that showed her draped over a '70s-era armchair, with knee-high boots and a boob on display. It was promptly removed by Instagram.

The popular photo-sharing platform has a history of strict censorship rules, banning everything from hashtags — good luck finding the eggplant emoji — to certain photos themselves, and Teigen was the latest high-profile user to run up against its policies. But rather than sit back and accept the censorship, Teigen took the opportunity to make a brilliant point about the inconsistent nature of the app's guidelines.

She posted a series of digitally altered versions of the same photograph, most of which made the original photo look more "artistic." Instagram's policy, after all, allows for "nudity in photos of paintings" — a ridiculous and oddly specific rule that's more confusing than it's worth. Despite the company's attempts at making its censorship policies easier to understand, it's still a minefield out there. (Teigen's digitally altered boobs are now gone as well.)

But Teigen's photographic tinkering experiment isn't the only evidence of Instagram's often arbitrary policies. Below, we've put together nine photo comparisons, each as seemingly racy as the other. Can you guess which ones Instagram decided to knock out? (Warning: NSFW material ahead.)

1. Rihanna vs. Kim Kardashian

Which one got banned: Rihanna

Instagram says it doesn't allow "close-ups of fully nude buttocks." It also says it doesn't allow photos of nipples. But somehow, Kardashian's Internet-breaking photo was allowed to stay, whereas Rihanna's was taken down and led her to bounce from the platform for a time.

2. Chelsea Handler vs. ALL THE PORN

Which one got banned: Handler

As Talking Points Memo found, hashtags like #boobs fill up with NSFW images, then get shut down and pop back up again as, say, #boooobs — again filled with porn. And Instagram's censors can have a tough time, because some of it, like the blurred image above, is posted with little more than tiny pink dots acting as modesty shields.

Handler received her ban for a photo in which she expressly decried Instagram's nipple-hating policies. After her topless photo was removed, she posted a photo of the warning, writing, "If a man posts a photo of his nipples, it's OK, but not a woman? Are we in 1825?" Yet an Instagram handle, @pretty_titties_submissions, posts what essentially amount to topless photos, but it hasn't seen Instagram's wrath.

3. Teigen vs. boob cakes

Which one got banned: Teigen

As Instagram shut down Teigen's imitation pencil-and-paper renderings of her W photo, she might have considered a different artistic way to get past the censors: making a cake version of her breasts. Instagram allows photos of cakes shaped like remarkably anatomically correct breasts, nipples included.

4. The artist Pebbles vs. the artist Sarah B. Whalen

Pebbles' work, left, and Whalen's.

Which one got banned: Pebbles' topless illustration

Pebbles' work is slightly less explicit than Whalen's erotic art, yet the former has seen her work stripped from Instagram more than once. Now, if she posts illustrations that feature nipples, she censors them with stars or hearts — and adds a caveat that an "uncensored version" is still available.

5. #FreeTheNipple vs. #FreeTheNipples

Which one got banned: #FreeTheNipple, Miley Cyrus edition

Cyrus is an avid supporter of the #FreeTheNipple campaign. She's posted more than one topless shot to her Instagram page. Yet while hers have been taken down, other posts — ones that contain actual sexually explicit material, like this video we've blurred above — are still floating around, many under the near-identical hashtag #FreeTheNipples.

6. Menstruation vs. a bloody lip

Which one got banned: Menstruation

A natural bodily function that happens to half the population shouldn't be reason to take down a photo, but that's what happened when Rupi Kaur posted a photo of menstrual blood to her Instagram page. Kaur rightly pointed out that the photo didn't violate any standards; Instagram later apologized, telling BuzzFeed "we wrongly removed content and worked to rectify the error as soon as we were notified." Meanwhile, men who get into violent fistfights can openly post photos of their cut-up faces with no fear of retribution.

7. Breastfeeding vs. breasts

Which one got banned (though later unbanned): Breastfeeding

Though the breastfeeding photo above does not show any nipple, it was still banned — unlike the photo next to it and this one (NSFW), boob close-ups that are about as sexual as you can get without full-on nudity. The good news: The outcry against banning breastfeeding photos was so strong that Instragram reversed its policy.

8. Female pubic hair vs. male pubic hair

Which one got banned: Female pubic hair

In January, Mic's Elizabeth Plank highlighted the ridiculousness that comes with banning photos showing pubic hair poking out. The people behind the image, an Australian husband-and-wife duo who run an agency called Sticks and Stones, noted the image wouldn't have run into issues if it featured men — which is exactly the case with the much more graphic photo above.

9. Scout Willis' T-shirt vs. a photo of a couple appearing to have sex

Willis' photo showing a shirt with two topless women was taken down, while a photo of a photo of actual (or simulated) sexual intercourse remains on the platform. (Willis retaliated by taking a topless stroll through New York City and posting evidence on Twitter.)

We're not advocating for Instagram to turn itself into a glorious porn emporium, but rather that the censorship standards become a little less arbitrary and a lot more consistent. While Instagram has apologized in the past for its random banning, and can only do so much with the people working on the censorship team, it's been an issue for a long while. It's one of the biggest and most popular photo-sharing platforms in the world — it's about time for a change.

Views: 2752


You need to be a member of CaribbeanFever / FeverEyes / CaribFever to add comments!

Join CaribbeanFever / FeverEyes / CaribFever

Comment by Greg Bjorg on February 14, 2019 at 4:28am

Yeah, that looks like s***. But what can we do against such social media giant? just accept the rules. Now Instagram is the best platform for blogging, so we can take advice from here, but some likes on and take a chance.

Comment by Drake Stevens on February 9, 2019 at 6:00am

Always been saying that instagram just sucks.

Comment by MsJay on July 7, 2015 at 2:37am
Whats next smh all porn no education well that's great something else for our children to learn anyway.
Comment by K. LeBlanc on July 4, 2015 at 2:38pm
Right @Jerome either that or Conservative orthodox a******* who believe in ancient society laws about female desecration. Smh. Get a life IG, and stop putting WOMEN in a box. Not to mention there is the GROSSEST s*** happening on IG from, by and with men and their male parts that no one wants to see. Not even male homosexuals.
Comment by Jerome S [ Barz ] on July 3, 2015 at 11:22pm
Sharing used to be about caring but instacram has no soul.
Apparently, the editors are homosexuals who don't appreciate female body parts possibly due to jealousy or envy.
I've never subscribed to instablam so this article is news to me.

Celebrate your BIRTHDAY with CaribbeanFever on 107.5 WBLS, NY







PUMP IT! or DUMP IT! SAT & SUN NIGHT on Caribbean Fever 107.5 WBLS NY (GET YOUR NEW MUSIC PLAYED) SONG{S} BEING VOTED ON ARE {------ ) and {----- }



Caribbean Fever with the best Caribbean News online!




© 2022   Created by Caribbean Fever.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service